Citation: Clinical Otolaryngology. 2021, 46(1) 229-33
Author: David Selwyn, Ding Yang, Elliot Heward, Ashwin Kerai, Elinor Thompson, Abulgasem Shommakhi, Scott Faulkner, Richard Siau, Hussein Walijee, Tom Hampton, Dorota Chudek, Supriya Singhera, Waqas Din, Andrew S Lau
Abstract: Objectives: Our primary aim was to validate the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) externally in a new patient cohort. Our secondary aim was to modify the LPS in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic to produce a no-examination variant for use in this instance.
Design: Prospective multicentre external validation study.
Setting: Six different secondary care institutions across the United Kingdom.
Participants: Patients over 16 years old who were referred to ENT with any uncomplicated sore throat such a tonsillitis or peritonsillar abscess (PTA).
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for both the original LPS model and the modified model for COVID-19.
Results: The LPS model had sensitivity and specificity calculated at 98% and 79%, respectively. The LPS has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was slightly lower at 63%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including the area under the curve (AUROC), was 0.888 which indicates very good accuracy.
Conclusions: External validation of the LPS against an independent geographically diverse population yields high NPV. This may support non-specialist colleagues who may have concerns about mis-diagnosing a PTA. The COVID-19 modification of the LPS has a similar NPV, which may be of use where routine oral examination is to be avoided during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: Peritonsillar abscess; diagnosis; dysphagia; swallowing.
Wednesday 24 February 2021
WUTH publication: A prospective multicentre external validation study of the Liverpool Peritonsillar abscess Score (LPS) with a no-examination COVID-19 modification
