Citation: Pediatric allergy and immunology. 2018, 29(7), 754-761. Epub 2018 Sep 17
Author: Arkwright PD, MacMahon J, Koplin J, Rajput S, Cross S, Fitzsimons R, Davidson N, Deshpande V, Rao N, Lumsden C, Lacy D, Allen KJ, Vance G, Mwenechanya J, Fox AT, Erlewyn-Lajeunesse M, Mistry H, Hourihane JO
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is classically managed by food avoidance. Immunotherapy programmes are available at some academic centers for selected patients reacting to small amounts of peanut during food challenge. We aimed to determine and compare reaction thresholds and prevalence of anaphylaxis during peanut oral challenges at multiple specialist allergy centers.
METHODS: A retrospective, international survey of anonymized case records from seven specialist paediatric allergy centers from the UK and Ireland, as well as the Australian HealthNuts study. Demographic information, allergy test results, reaction severity and threshold during open oral peanut challenges were collated and analysed.
RESULTS: Of the 1,634 children aged 1 to 18 years old included, 525 (32%) failed their peanut challenge. 28% reacted to 25mg, while 38% only reacted after consuming 1g or more of whole peanut. Anaphylaxis (55 (11%)) was 3-times more common in teenagers than younger children and the likelihood increased at all ages as children consuming more peanut at the challenge. Children who developed anaphylaxis to smaller 25-200mg whole peanut were significantly older. Previous history of reaction did not predict reaction threshold or severity.
CONCLUSIONS: More than a third of the children in this large international cohort tolerated the equivalent of one peanut in an oral challenge. Anaphylaxis, particularly to small amounts of peanut was more common in older children. Tailored immunotherapy programmes might be considered not only for children with low, but also higher reaction thresholds. Whether these programmes could prevent heightened sensitivity and anaphylaxis to peanut with age also deserves further study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS: anaphylaxis; children; food allergy; oral food challenge; peanut; threshold
Link to PubMed record
Friday 20 July 2018
Tuesday 3 July 2018
WUTH publication: Anaesthetic management of robotic-assisted gynaecology surgery in the morbidly obese - A case series of 46 patients in a UK university teaching hospital
Citation: Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018, 62(6), 443-448
Author: Sadashivaiah J, Ahmed D, Gul N
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evolution of robotic technology has enhanced the scope of laparoscopic surgery. Morbid obesity [body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2] due to significant physiological attributes presents a significant surgical and anaesthetic challenge. Robotic surgery in this subset of patients can present with its own problems due to surgical requirements of prolonged pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
METHODS: We reviewed the anaesthetic management of 46 morbidly obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecology surgery. Patient characteristics, anaesthetic management, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and readmissions within 30 days were noted. Mean with standard deviation was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] weight and BMI were 121.2 (18.49) kg and 47.83 (7.89) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (SD) anaesthetic and surgical times were 229 (75.9) and 167.7 (62.7) min, respectively. The mean (SD) LOS was 1.57 (1.03) days. About 70% of patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. Six patients needed critical care support. There were two readmissions within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Good preparation, teamwork, and multidisciplinary input helped us to conduct complex robotic-assisted and long-duration surgery in morbidly obese patients with minimal complications.
KEYWORDS: Anaesthetic management; laparoscopy complications; morbid obesity; pneumoperitoneum
Link to PubMed record
Author: Sadashivaiah J, Ahmed D, Gul N
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evolution of robotic technology has enhanced the scope of laparoscopic surgery. Morbid obesity [body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2] due to significant physiological attributes presents a significant surgical and anaesthetic challenge. Robotic surgery in this subset of patients can present with its own problems due to surgical requirements of prolonged pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
METHODS: We reviewed the anaesthetic management of 46 morbidly obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecology surgery. Patient characteristics, anaesthetic management, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and readmissions within 30 days were noted. Mean with standard deviation was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] weight and BMI were 121.2 (18.49) kg and 47.83 (7.89) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (SD) anaesthetic and surgical times were 229 (75.9) and 167.7 (62.7) min, respectively. The mean (SD) LOS was 1.57 (1.03) days. About 70% of patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. Six patients needed critical care support. There were two readmissions within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Good preparation, teamwork, and multidisciplinary input helped us to conduct complex robotic-assisted and long-duration surgery in morbidly obese patients with minimal complications.
KEYWORDS: Anaesthetic management; laparoscopy complications; morbid obesity; pneumoperitoneum
Link to PubMed record
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)