Citation: Clinical Oncology. 2019 Jun 6 [Epub ahead of print]
Author: Naismith OF, Griffin C, Syndikus I, South C, Mayles H, Mayles P, Khoo V, Scrase C, Graham J, Hassan S, Hall E, Dearnaley DP; CHHiP Investigators
Abstract: AIMS: The CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High-dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy In Prostate Cancer; CRUK/06/016) trial investigated hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Forward- (FP) or inverse-planned (IP) intensity-modulated techniques were permitted. Dose-volume histogram and toxicity data were compared to explore the effects of planning method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 337 participants with intermediate-risk disease and prospectively collected toxicity data were included. Patients were matched on prostate and rectum/bladder volumes and on radiotherapy dose for toxicity comparisons. The primary outcome was grade 2 or higher Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) bowel or bladder toxicity at 2 years.
RESULTS: IP patients had smaller volumes of rectum irradiated to 50-70 Gy (P < 0.001); FP patients had smaller volumes of bladder irradiated to 74 Gy (P = 0.001). Acute grade 2 + bowel toxicity was worse with FP (27/53 [52%]; 11/53 [21%] IP; P = 0.0002); with no significant differences in acute urinary toxicity. At 2 years, RTOG grade 2 + bowel toxicity rates were FP 0/53 and IP 2/53 and RTOG grade 2 + bladder rates were FP 0/54 and IP 1/57.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were found between dose-volume histograms from FP and IP methods. IP may result in small reductions in acute bowel toxicity but both techniques were associated with low rates of late radiotherapy side-effects.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS: DVH; forward planning; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; inverse planning; prostate cancer; toxicity
Link to PubMed record
