Citation: Health Information and Libraries Journal, 2012, Jul 26
Author: Hannah Gray, Gary Sutton, Victoria Treadway
Abstract: Background
A turbulent financial and political climate requires health libraries to be more accountable than ever. Quality improvement systems are widely considered a ‘good thing to do’, but do they produce useful outcomes that can demonstrate value?
Objectives
To undertake a systematic review to identify which aspects of health libraries are being measured for quality, what tools are being used and what outcomes are reported following utilisation of quality improvement systems.
Results
Many health libraries utilise quality improvement systems without translating the data into service improvements. Included studies demonstrate that quality improvement systems produce valuable outcomes including a positive impact on strategic planning, promotion, new and improved services and staff development. No impact of quality improvement systems on library users or patients is reported in the literature.
Conclusions
The literature in this area is sparse and requires updating. We recommend further primary research is conducted in health libraries focusing upon the outcomes of utilising quality improvement systems. An exploration of quality improvement systems in other library sectors may also provide valuable insight for health libraries.
Link to Pubmed record
For more information about obtaining the full text of journal articles, please visit our Document / Book Supply service
To view all WUTH publications please link here.
